A Bengaluru-based chartered accountant has sparked a debate on the rising price of Indian weddings after advising households towards spending ₹20 lakh on extravagant celebrations, arguing that the identical quantity may very well be used to construct long-term monetary safety.
In a put up on Instagram, Meenal Goel urged folks to rethink lavish wedding ceremony budgets and as a substitute make investments a portion of the cash in belongings and future objectives.
“Do not spend ₹20 lakh to impress kinfolk,” Goel stated, calling it one of many largest monetary errors Indian households make.
Explaining how such a price range is often spent, she stated a hypothetical ₹20 lakh wedding ceremony might embody ₹6 lakh on meals, ₹5 lakh on the venue, ₹3 lakh on decorations, and ₹2 lakh every on pictures, leisure and miscellaneous bills.
Do not Miss: From Haldiram’s to Lakshmi Mittal: Who made hundreds of thousands from Skyroot, India’s first personal house unicorn
“A ₹20 lakh wedding ceremony feels unforgettable till you have a look at your checking account,” she stated.
Goel argued that whereas weddings might final only some days, the monetary penalties usually stay lengthy after the celebrations finish.
Learn the viral put up right here:
She identified that inside 48 hours, the venue is returned, the meals is gone, the decorations are eliminated and company transfer on to the subsequent wedding ceremony. What stays, she stated, is the monetary affect.
As an alternative of spending all the quantity on a marriage, Goel recommended directing at the very least a part of the cash in direction of a house down cost, an emergency fund, long-term investments, future youngsters’s schooling or monetary safety.
“A marriage is a celebration. It does not should develop into a monetary burden. Rejoice inside your means, create recollections, and begin your married life with monetary peace – not monetary stress. Construct a wedding, not only a wedding ceremony,” she stated, whereas questioning whether or not Indian weddings had develop into unnecessarily costly.
The put up triggered a full of life dialogue on-line, with customers divided over whether or not weddings must be handled as memorable life occasions or monetary liabilities.
One consumer agreed with Goel’s recommendation and wrote, “The primary reward a pair ought to give themselves is monetary stability. A smaller wedding ceremony and a stronger future seems like a greater deal.”
One other commenter stated, “Many middle-class households spend years repaying loans taken for weddings. We have to normalise celebrations that match our budgets.”
Not everybody shared the identical view. One consumer argued, “Folks save for years for this event. If somebody can comfortably afford it, there’s nothing incorrect with spending on their special occasion.”
A fourth commenter struck a center floor, saying, “The problem is not spending cash on weddings. The problem is spending past your means simply to satisfy social expectations.”
