Kylie Jenner is going through a second lawsuit from one other former worker, alleging she confronted office discrimination.
Juana Delgado Soto, who labored as a housekeeper for the fact TV star for six years, filed a grievance in Los Angeles Superior Court docket on Wednesday, in keeping with courtroom paperwork obtained by the Los Angeles Occasions, Rolling Stone and USA Right now.
In line with the Los Angeles Time, Soto filed the lawsuit in opposition to Jenner, Kylie Jenner Inc., workers supervisor Itzel Sibrian, Tri Star Providers and La Maison Household Providers, alleging racial discrimination, harassment, failure to pay wages, failure to forestall or treatment harassment and discrimination, wrongful termination and extra.
World Information has not independently seen the courtroom paperwork.
“On behalf of our purchasers, we need to be clear: no worker—whatever the energy, wealth, or fame of their employer—ought to ever be compelled to endure illegal working circumstances, wage violations, retaliation, intimidation, or mistreatment within the office,” Soto’s lawyer Della Shaker advised World Information in an announcement.
(Shaker additionally represents Angelica Hernandez Vasquez, who filed a lawsuit in opposition to Kylie Jenner Inc., Tri Star Providers and La Maison Household Providers final week.)

World Information has reached out to Jenner’s consultant for additional remark, however has not obtained a response.
Soto, who started working for the 28-year-old actuality TV star in 2019, claimed that she made a report back to human sources about her alleged remedy by workers members in 2024, in keeping with the Occasions’ reporting.
Soto reportedly claimed that Sibrian mocked and humiliated her for her accent, immigration standing and race and known as her “silly.”
Sibrian was temporality eliminated due to the grievance however then reinstated, in keeping with the lawsuit. Soto claims that’s when Sibrian “got down to retaliate in opposition to” her for submitting the grievance by “lowering her hourly wage, assigning unreasonable workloads and altering her schedule,” in keeping with the Occasions’ report.
In April 2025, the swimsuit obtained by the Occasions alleges that after “repeated failures by administration to handle Soto’s issues, she wrote a protracted letter to Jenner detailing the harassment, discrimination and retaliation and positioned in on Jenner’s therapeutic massage mattress instantly earlier than her therapeutic massage.”
Get breaking Nationwide information
Get breaking Canada information delivered to your inbox because it occurs so you will not miss a trending story.
Soto reportedly wrote, “I want to precise how terribly I’m mentally abused” and “I actually apologize for letting you already know about all these conditions, I do know you wouldn’t permit this to occur, for those who have been conscious of it.”
Soto alleges that the next day she was “threatened with termination and instructed by no means to contact Jenner once more,” the Occasions reviews.
“Defendants advised her she was not allowed to have a look at Kylie, smile at Kylie and if she was Kylie she must ‘disappear,’” the authorized docs reportedly learn.
In August 2025, Soto reportedly despatched a textual content message to her supervisors, writing, “I’m sorry, I can not do that anymore, day by day you guys mistreat me, and I’ve bitten all my nails off, I can not sleep at nights, and I at all times have nervousness due to the best way you guys deal with me. It doesn’t matter what I did nobody helped me.”
Soto is in search of an unspecified quantity of punitive and compensatory damages.

Soto’s lawsuit comes after one other former housekeeper of Jenner’s, Angelica Hernandez Vasquez, filed a lawsuit in opposition to Kylie Jenner Inc., Tri Star Providers and La Maison Household Providers, claiming was subjected to “extreme and pervasive harassment” whereas working on the magnificence mogul’s residence.
Vasquez labored for Jenner from September 2024 to August 2025, and claims that from her first day on workers at Jenner’s residence in Hidden Hills, Calif., she was handled with “hostility and exclusion” by the top housekeeper, recognized as Patsy, and one other supervisor, recognized as Elsi, in keeping with courtroom paperwork obtained by the Los Angeles Occasions, Folks and E! Information.
The lawsuit doesn’t particularly attribute any alleged discrimination to Jenner particularly, however she’s listed as a defendant alongside Tri Star Providers and La Maison Household Providers and 25 people who’ve but to be recognized, in keeping with E! Information.
Vasquez, who’s described as a “Salvadoran girl and training Catholic” within the authorized docs, alleged that she was “routinely assigned essentially the most troublesome and undesirable duties; excluded from the housekeeping workforce; publicly belittled and humiliated in entrance of coworkers on account of her race, nationwide origin and faith; and subjected to intimidation and demeaning remedy” throughout her employment.
Vasquez alleges that the defendants did not pay her in full, paid her late, did not pay extra time wages and did not reimburse enterprise bills, in keeping with the Occasions.
She’s requesting a jury trial and in search of damages “within the type of unpaid wages, meal and relaxation interval premium pay, unreimbursed enterprise bills, unpaid sick depart, and all different compensation unlawfully withheld.”
This isn’t the primary time a member of the Kardashian-Jenner household has been sued by former workers.
In 2021, Kim Kardashian was sued by seven members of her home workers who claimed that the fact star uncared for to pay them correctly or give them acceptable breaks.
In line with the civil motion, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court docket, “Plaintiffs by no means obtained any paystubs, weren’t paid on common pay durations, weren’t given their required meal and relaxation breaks, weren’t offered a way to file all their hours, weren’t paid all their hours, weren’t reimbursed for employment bills, weren’t paid all their extra time wages, and weren’t paid their wages upon termination of employment.”
The seven staff who filed the lawsuit didn’t specify the precise quantity they have been in search of in damages, however mentioned it was in extra of US$25,000, not together with curiosity.

A consultant for The Kardashians star mentioned in an announcement that Kardashian can’t be held accountable as a result of the employees have been offered by means of an unidentified “third-party vendor.”
By November 2023, Kardashian agreed to a authorized settlement with the previous workers after a scheduled trial for November 2023 to January 2024 was known as off.
Kardashian and the defendants advised the courtroom they’d “reached an settlement in precept to resolve this motion.” The phrases of the deal have been saved personal.




