What, precisely, does a Director of Cognitive Benefit do? It’s not a title most People encounter, and it sits far exterior the acquainted contours of diplomacy, army power, or financial leverage. However as Chenoweth explains, the competition for affect now not stays neatly inside these lanes both.
His focus is usually on the grey house – the place info, notion, tradition, and habits collide, and the place adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are working with staggering sources and strategic focus.
On this Cipher Temporary dialog, Chenoweth breaks down how cognitive operations really work, why the U.S. has struggled to maintain tempo, and what it means to offer the President an “info choice” that’s not merely kinetic or financial.
He affords uncommon, candid perception into how know-how, AI, and social platforms—from TikTok to algorithmically pushed personas—are reshaping the battlespace sooner than policymakers can write doctrine.
Our dialog is a deep dive into one of many least understood – however maybe most consequential – fronts of recent nationwide safety. Our dialog has been evenly edited for size and readability.
Shawn Chenoweth
Shawn Chenoweth is the Director of Cognitive Benefit on the US Nationwide Safety Council.
The Cipher Temporary: How do you clarify the function of the director of Cognitive Benefit?
Chenoweth: While you take a look at conventional parts of army energy, you in all probability consider the DIME assemble. It isn’t an ideal assemble, but it surely’s fairly good. DIME, is damaged down into Diplomatic, Data, Navy and Financial, and it’s totally clear who owns the Diplomatic, Navy, and Financial elements. However there hasn’t been, no less than in a number of many years, a superb instance of the place individuals have actually come to the president and the administration with an “I” choice, for Data. And it is a disgrace as a result of while you really take a look at the DIME assemble, you do not need to break it into range pipes. We should always consider it as a cell. Every of these parts acts as a part of a functioning cell, and eradicating any of these parts means you’ve got an imperfect or failing cell.
So, I used to be requested to assist put the “I” again in DIME in order that we are able to present further choices and benefits throughout the opposite parts of DIME to nationwide energy and supply the president with alternatives to perform the Administration’s aims that are not simply warheads on foreheads or threatening economics or expending political leverage. We are able to improve these issues, however we are able to additionally achieve benefits by utilizing cognitive results via the knowledge setting.
Kelly: Let’s set the stage a bit additional. In the event you had been to clarify to the typical American what is going on when it comes to cognitive warfare within the grey zone – the world the place battle happens beneath the extent of warfare – how would you describe it?
Chenoweth: I feel for those who look via your army histories, philosophers, politicians, political science, it is all fairly clear. You possibly can select the weather. All of them have one underlying thread, which is that political victory is the one which issues at its core. That is actually what we’re speaking about. Nothing’s modified. How human beings are linked, how know-how is affected has definitely modified. However what we actually care about is what individuals do in the actual world and the geophysical world, the world we stay in.
So, the purpose of a cognitive benefit is to leverage that in order that human beings are taking behaviors favorable to outcomes, to nationwide aims, which more often than not are additionally – within the case of the USA – favorable in their very own proper. So it is core. And that’s what we’re driving to get: these benefits in what individuals do in the actual world via their sensing, to make choices that come again to the actual world and have the results that you really want.
Kelly: Are you able to give an instance of what that will appear like?
Chenoweth: For example you are negotiating for a bit of land or a base that you simply want for overflight intel assortment. You are going to conduct a trade-off in negotiations. Possibly it should appear like, – for those who pay extra, you may get extra – based mostly off what the worth proposition is. However very not often is it that blatant and easy. So, what you need to have the ability to do is perceive, what benefit would we’d like within the negotiation? What’s really driving this different get together aside from possibly simply value or simply hazard? What’s the chance calculus?
There are cultural nuances that have an effect on issues: their understanding of affect, political implications. So, the purpose can be to grasp why they might have an interest on this within the first place? What benefit does it give them? What are the cultural nuances? Why would not they do that within the first place? Why aren’t they taking this motion and what can we do to guarantee that the result is what we wish?
There are different areas the place that applies throughout the spectrum.
For example we’re conducting counter-terrorism operations, and we all know an goal tends to make use of a selected cafe. Properly, what in the event that they had been utilizing a special one which day? What can we do to affect them to go to a spot that is extra favorable for choices to lower our personal danger calculus, both as a result of we need to conduct a kinetic strike or make an arrest? Possibly we will not discover them. So, what if we use that for our intel assortment and our strategies to mainly make them come up on comms and alter their habits so it is simpler to search out them, gather on them, and construct the info in order that we are able to conduct bodily actions to cease or disrupt them? And you’ll type of see how that applies throughout the board.
If greater than the individual you are coping with, likelihood is that you will be higher at carrying out your final result. It’s very related with the werewolf principle. It is a recreation the place two persons are chosen to be the werewolf of the village and everybody else within the group would not know who the werewolf is. More often than not the people who find themselves the werewolves win the sport as a result of they’ve an info benefit over everybody else taking part in the sport. So, it is a human norm.
And once more, I level out that nothing’s new beneath the solar. It is simply that we’ve not actually thought via the implications of what it means within the info age that we stay in – the place everyone seems to be linked via software program outlined radios. We’re a good distance away from direct sensing the place it is communication and issues taking place in the actual world. Now we now have form of oblique sensing the place you are fed information feeds and every little thing else. We are able to have an effect on cognitive habits in methods we by no means imagined, and we actually have not thought via simply as we are able to attain individuals and promote objects. And if I need to discover an individual whose favourite shade is crimson, who’s a army age male who’s actually into Magnum PI, I can discover that individual because of their radio, and I can craft messages particularly for somebody who matches that demographic and transfer them in a selected path. That is the primary time in historical past that that is been the case.
Kelly: You might have a background that mixes each authorities and personal sector expertise. On condition that know-how is being quickly developed within the personal sector, how do you suppose that background provides you a bonus on this function?
Chenoweth: There are lots of people who’ve served within the army and have been contractors however simply by happenstance, I occur to have been in a variety of important places at important instances. I feel one of many benefits that has introduced me is that I noticed the frustration inside the army when the contracting equipment did not work. I used to be additionally empowered by trade to go and repair a variety of these constructions and allow the federal government to do it, and now I am getting afforded the chance to work on coverage to make the system actually hum.
I feel the benefit with that’s that on the subject of the knowledge house, there is not any management. And I attempt to emphasize this to any coverage maker or energy dealer or choice maker that I can discover. You possibly can put an armored brigade in an intersection – totally geared up, totally supported – and a U.S. Armored Brigade may personal that intersection. There are issues you possibly can management. However on the subject of the knowledge house, there is no such thing as a management. It’s consistently shifting, consistently altering. You might have a binary choice. You’re both going to take part, ideally at a stage that issues, or not, and no matter’s going to occur goes to occur.
So, you would end up in an advantageous info house within the morning, lose it by the late morning, get a stalemate within the afternoon, and win it again within the afternoon – simply to lose it once more on the finish of the day. And while you get up the following morning, you are going to should do it over again. There is no such thing as a, “Now we have info dominance and we’re completed and we are able to crack our beers and go on with different issues.”
That is not how this works as a result of day by day new info is being injected into the system. Individuals are altering and growing new opinions. Issues are occurring and persons are going to react to these issues, change their opinions, adapt, age out, age in, so these cultural references might change. It is a fixed flux. One of many issues that from the U.S. authorities aspect we’re getting our head round is that we’d like an info service group consistently working afloat within the info setting, successfully. One which’s engaged 24/7 to have an effect on these modifications.
The Cipher Temporary is partnering with the Data Professionals Affiliation and the Nationwide Middle for Narrative Intelligence to carry you Pinnacle 2026: Grey Zone Convergence: Cognitive Safety on the Intersection of Affect, Innovation, and Shared Pursuits. Register for the February 9-10 convention now to safe your spot.
Kelly: It isn’t simply the USA that has gotten fairly good at understanding the affect of cognitive benefit. We see these ways from China and Russia getting used with beautiful success. On this function, how targeted are you on their actions on the subject of doing the very same factor that you simply’re tasked with doing?
Chenoweth: They completely observe these actions. I name them the ‘CRINKETT’. Each problem we’re usually coping with falls within the CRINKETTS. It is China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Terrorists and Trans[national] criminals. And notably for the nation states, that is precisely how they need to compete.
From their perspective, there are two methods to cope with the USA: asymmetrically and stupidly, largely due to our financial and army energy. They get that. They don’t seem to be interested by a kinetic battle; that’s an terrible prospect. So the way in which they need to do that is in grey zone actions, within the info house, within the cognitive area.
And so they outspend us. I am not going to say essentially outperform, however I will say if you wish to compete at a stage that issues, they outspend us, interval. Iran in all probability spends round $1.8 billion plus-minus a 12 months, possibly extra with their proxies and every little thing else they do on this specific house. Russia – publish Ukraine invasion, spends about $2.6 billion, one thing like that. China – 48 plus billion {dollars} a 12 months. The U.S., if I take all the actions from the DoD, the State Division and every little thing else, and you set these collectively, you would possibly strategy $1.2 billion.
It doesn’t suggest we’re executing these funds both. It simply implies that that is what we have allotted. When you consider how we outspend to have a bonus on the opposite elements of DIME, we’re hideously underperforming right here. And once more, all props to the administration. They’re conscious about this and the assist I’ve had on the Nationwide Safety Council and throughout the weather of presidency – the departments and businesses – has been stellar. And we will proceed to work on this and get it proper as a result of we now have three and a half extra years of President Trump’s administration to get this proper, do the reps and units, and make this a sturdy coverage in order that the American individuals can begin having fun with these advantages that come after we’re actually targeted on this house.
Kelly: What does success appear like for you on this function and the way do you measure it?
Chenoweth: Measurement has at all times been a humorous factor. Individuals will consistently inform me how laborious it’s to measure these actions. And what I’ve discovered time and time once more is that we’re really fairly good at these actions. The problems with the measurements are, once more, taking part at a scale that issues. We have to measure habits change, and with the intention to do this, we have to have clear aims. What are we after?
The large a part of that’s who’s the audience that has the company to do the factor we wish? We spend a variety of time planning and CONOPS [Concept of Operations] on sub-target audiences that do not even have the company – in hopes that they have an effect on company – and that is completely positive. However why are we doing assessments in opposition to this? We spend a variety of money and time producing assessments to focus on audiences that do not have the company you need. So, let’s deal with the audience that has the company and let’s do that at scale.
For instance; I am within the DC space and I can go all the way down to the Potomac River, drop a bucket of water within the river, and I’ve objectively molecularly elevated the quantity of water within the Potomac. There is not a sensor on this planet that’s going to detect that molecular change.
The very fact is that you simply may be having an impact, however you do not have a sensor that’s going to select that up. So, you’ll want to improve your scale or customise your sensing system to the impact you are having. That tends to be the place the assessments collapse.
I’ve heard on a regular basis for many years now that assessments are so laborious. I do not discover that to be true. What I discover is that you have sacrificed assessments for impact, which is ok. It is danger calculus. If I had a low quantity of sources and I made a decision to place as a lot into the impact I’ve needed, that is positive. However on the finish of the day, you are searching for the actual habits change within the focused viewers that issues. What are the sensors you’ve got on that and what are you doing to gather that information: public opinion, analysis surveys, constructing the networks. We will see this exacerbate additional because the AI revolution continues at tempo.
Kelly: How is know-how impacting what you are making an attempt to do, your mission, after which how are you additionally working with the personal sector as a result of the personal sector is controlling a lot of the know-how and the innovation that the federal government must work with. So how are you doing that?
Chenoweth: One of many challenges I see rising from AI is that there is form of an assumption that AI will repair all of your woes. I’ve seen the perfect instruments on the market do one factor: they mannequin the info they’ve, and that is the core difficulty. We do not have the info. So once more, I am again to there’s not a complete lot of recent issues beneath the solar. And the AI fashions are actually good, and it will possibly help you discover new insights from the info that you’ve, however new information must be created. So, sacrificing assortment methodologies and new approaches to collect the info on the foot of a mannequin is horrible.
The AI snake oil salesman I might cope with in trade on a regular basis would are available and say, ‘Oh, you are interested by that? I may completely mannequin you the factor.’ Cool. How does that work? ‘Properly, all it’s a must to do is present me the info and we’ll put all this collectively and provide the insights.’ I am like, whoa. We do not have the info both. Nobody has the info. That is type of the issue. So, let’s be sincere about what we’re doing.
AI goes to be an awesome boon for trade and for the federal government and everybody else beneath the solar. It may clearly have affect, however I feel as that strikes ahead, we have to begin how we really make use of it. Constructing an agent or a token for each employee so that they are augmented by an AI that does the factor that they themselves will not be good at or saving them time goes to be superb, but it surely must be undergirded by with the ability to detect what’s really taking place out in the actual world. And people two issues aren’t essentially – not interrelated. As I mentioned, most issues are variety of a complete cell that function in a single unit, and we will not essentially bifurcate this stuff after which anticipate good outcomes.
Former Senior CIA Govt Dave Pitts wrote a three-part sequence solely for The Cipher Temporary on what the U.S. can do to turn out to be extra aggressive within the Grey Zone. Subscriber+Members can learn it right here. Want entry? We may help with that.
Kelly: So you’ve got a mission that’s tough to measure, is vastly impactful, adversaries are utilizing it as nicely in opposition to Americans successfully, and in some circumstances, these adversaires are dedicating much more sources to this. In the event you may explaine to the typical U.S. citizen how they may be focused by cognitive operations which might be carried out by U.S. adversaries, what would you inform them to search for?
Chenoweth: You’ll want to be aware of sources clearly. Once I take a look at the assemble of how we strategy cognitive warfare, I feel one of many greatest issues I’ve had for no less than the final 10 years has been the assemble of dis- and misinformation. My difficulty is not the dis- and misinformation assemble. It is the overuse of it.
Disinformation and misinformation are issues. They’ve that means. However they imply one thing that’s true and folks use it for issues that aren’t true. For instance, disinformation are lies. The individual projecting the knowledge is aware of it is a lie. They’re doing it to perform an goal. The larger downside of disinformation is misinformation. These are people who find themselves sharing these lies, not understanding they’re lies, or taking issues out of context like satire, et cetera, and propagating as if it had been fact. These are what these are.
However not every little thing we now have to cope with falls into that assemble. There are two different parts to this that we now have to be aware of.
One is lacking info, which used to imply that the audience wasn’t knowledgeable sufficient to make an accurate choice, favorable to them or anybody else. ‘It is a tragedy that your member of the family died and you must mourn their loss, however cease touching the physique. That is the way you’re spreading Ebola’, proper? Fairly easy, fairly easy.
Now that we’re coping with nation states with deep pockets, that is been flipped up on its head they usually’re working towards energetic lacking info, the place they’ll present wire companies into a rustic saying, ‘Congratulations, you should use our wire service at no cost and we’ll present you all of the stuff, and that is your greatest value aside from labor. Is not that fantastic? The catch is that you simply simply have to make use of our wire service’.
In the event you suppose [contextual] tales are going to get into the press via these channels, good luck. This is not taking place within the third world. These are taking place in main international locations and locations that will shock you.
Think about one thing like, ‘In the event you run this story, all our linked companies which might be linked via us or different means are going to drag their promoting funds from you.’ So once more, good luck speaking in regards to the story in your setting. Nobody’s going to the touch it. No influencer needs a bit of it as a result of they will lose their incentive construction and their income stream. It is issues like that.
On the opposite aspect of the coin, and the larger downside, is the rhetoric info. These are the issues that are not essentially true or false. They’re framed by your worth system, the way you view issues, what you suppose fact really is.
There are individuals on the market who will say, I feel a communist socialist type of authorities that’s extremely authoritarian is extra steady and subsequently higher than a liberal democracy. There are individuals who imagine that, and simply by saying, nicely, historical past would show you in any other case, it isn’t a adequate argument. You’ll want to interact with these individuals at a scale that issues and be ready to win the argument.
We have seen this time once more on the counter-terrorism entrance the place we might shut down the comms of a no person, and immediately that individual would come again with the popularity that was so helpful, and now they are a terrorist thought chief as a result of the Western world thought that they had been so harmful they wanted to be shut down as a substitute of simply accepting the very fact, that possibly we must always simply interact with this man as a result of nobody’s ever heard of him and possibly we must always simply level out that he is a moron.
There are methods to cope with this, and simply because we do not like one thing doesn’t suggest it is a misinform the individual that’s spreading it. They may imagine it. Earlier than we simply title one thing disinformation and say, nicely, it is a lie and we are able to ignore it — that’s not satisfactory within the fashionable period the place everyone seems to be linked as a result of, once more, this individual has connective tissue to the web. They’ve net platforms. They are often simply as linked as a authorities if they need to select to be and if they’ve the recognition, as a result of at its core, no matter whether or not or not you are a authorities or a star or the rest, you might be combating for consideration.
Kelly: It’s typically tough for busy People to navigate the knowledge house right this moment and know what to imagine with out inviting some critical time into the supply. Do you take a look at a part of your mission on this function as serving to individuals perceive extra of the context they want with the intention to make good choices?
Chenoweth: I have been extra on the aspect coping with overseas audiences. However even in that regard, I feel that it actually issues to ask what are the issues that we all know to be what we really feel are goal truths and issues that matter? Issues that we wish goal audiences to know as a result of we all know it could be higher for them and higher for our aims?
After which what are the issues the place we simply need to guarantee that if a debate must be had, we facilitate the controversy in order that the audience, notably with an American audience – which once more, it isn’t my forte, we do not do this in authorities or should not — that must be facilitated by People mentioning to one another that we do have to have these debates and are available to type of consensus, understanding that there might be disagreements.
Kelly: Do you suppose your job goes to be much more vital sooner or later or possibly much less?
Chenoweth: I’ve by no means thought the job wasn’t vital. I feel the factor I am having fun with proper now’s that everybody’s type of getting their head round what this implies. The overused expression that ‘We have to do some issues on Fb,’ while you would have policymakers say, ‘Properly, I am involved that that will destroy Amazon and web commerce’ and your head would explode as you are making an attempt to clarify, ‘That is simply not how the web works, man.’
We may be snug working on these platforms and doing issues that we have to do with out destroying web commerce or the web. And now I feel a variety of coverage makers and trade are all linked. They’re much more snug doing this stuff. Now could be the time when we have to get to the place the sources and the permissions actually match the power to get us the place we should be.
I’ve usually not discovered too many authority issues. I usually discover permissions issues. I discover that on the subject of authorities, you nearly at all times discover that each group really has a framework that enables them to do issues. It is simply that somebody someplace within the chain can say no and is all too snug saying no, as a result of, notably prior to now administration, they had been very snug at avoiding danger and never as snug at managing danger. And that could be a dynamic that we now have to alter. The world is a dangerous place, and we should be on the market taking part in it, throwing our elbows round and managing the chance, not avoiding it.
Kelly: How laborious of a job is it to offer the U.S. the cognitive benefit in right this moment’s world?
Chenoweth: It is laborious, tremendously laborious since you’re speaking about altering tradition. I do not suppose the exercise itself and the coverage and the issues that may be completed are laborious. I feel the laborious half might be altering the tradition and altering individuals’s mindsets.
We have talked about the truth that there was three domains: bodily area, info area and cognitive area. Now we have to discover the knowledge area and really name it what it’s. There may be the bodily area, the geophysical area. However I just like the ‘kill net’ strategy. A superb kill net will represent a kill chain that’s disrupted, and we now have to get out of only a kill chain. We have to get right into a kill net mentality on the subject of cognitive results.
Kelly: Clarify what you imply by a “kill net”?
Chenoweth: You might have your geophysical world the place issues exist in the actual world, the place the place all of us stay. On the subject of the knowledge area, although, it used to consolidate a bunch of issues.
The fact is that after we break that down right into a kill net, you are wanting out of your bodily area as much as your logic layer. The web just isn’t some amorphous cloud that wanders round. It is composed of a system of techniques that stay in the actual world. It is information facilities, servers, modems, et cetera. The place does that infrastructure really exist? Typically the information are within the laptop. So, we should be aware of the place does that work? How does the web, how do these constructions work, the cell networks, et cetera.
From there, it then creates the digital layer, the place all of the trons are that exist. You possibly can have results, that is the place your actual our on-line world comes into play. That is how the cell gadgets work, however that’s simply information.
Then it goes as much as the persona entity stage. These are the actual human beings, typically faux human beings, they’re personas, organizations however entities that probably may very well be focused or addressed or engaged, et cetera.
After which there’s the cognitive house. The trick within the cognitive house is what occurs within the thoughts. And that thoughts is influenced by the sensing that goes up via that chain once they course of it. You are in a position to interdict on its method up or affect, and also you’re in a position to affect on the way in which down when a choice is made.
For instance, when one thing occurs in the actual world, it is communicated to a choice maker, however it should undergo the logic layer transmitted via sensors, computer systems, emails, telephones, et cetera, to individuals and entities who’re going to course of it themselves, talk it to a choice maker who’s going to decide based mostly off that info, or a person or a bunch of people.
They’re all going to make choices on tips on how to react to that or not react to that. And that is going to return all the way down to the bodily world once they say, ‘I do not actually like what is going on’, or possibly ‘I do like what’s taking place. Let’s do the factor’. They will talk that all the way down to ‘Sure, launch the missiles’, or ‘Let’s have a protest’. So, you possibly can have an effect on the chain up. You possibly can have an effect on the chain down, however that is the way it works.
We as the USA have a pipe that exists inside that kill net construction – so does everybody else. And it would not matter for those who’re a nation state or a household or a person. You might have your sensing sources.
As I discussed earlier, the direct conversations between individuals in the actual world – even now, you and I are speaking fully over that total construction – and that construction may very well be affected on the way in which up as we’re speaking to when that is lastly produced and goes again out to the actual world the place immediately I’ve AI results on me and I am saying issues I by no means meant to say, however the remainder of the world’s now decoding that.
I did not say that, that wasn’t my cognitive choice, however you intercepted on the way in which down and now you’d inadvertently have an effect on everybody else’s cognitive strategy to what I am speaking.
Kelly: What does the longer term from a know-how and AI standpoint actually appear like?
Chenoweth: It is having basic modifications. It may be fascinating to see what occurs within the leisure trade as AI takes over and immediately individuals can have extra entry. We have seen how the music trade went via big change simply on streaming music. We’re about to witness what that is going to appear like from our extra conventional platforms. We have seen how issues transfer from streaming. I feel there’s a stage of adaptation that is going to go together with that.
One of many issues that must be addressed is how precisely we will interact. There’s a level the place we should be snug with giving form of steering to the AIs – human within the loop – however for those who suppose that you are going to have the ability to overview each single message that should exit in an AI-driven world, you are out of your thoughts.
So, you want to have the ability to be snug producing in your audience profiles and provides form of thematic steering and let the AI do some stage of engagements in opposition to overseas audiences to steer conversations in a selected path, or no less than establish the place a dialog may be going so you possibly can intervene when it seems to be like choices are being made in a foul method, after which discover out if that’s an open and sincere cultural nuance factor the place it’s about engagement or if it is being steered by your opponent.
I feel that we aren’t far, and we’re in all probability already in a recreation, the place there are AIs versus AIs as we converse within the info setting.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Temporary as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.
