Former That ’70s Present actor Danny Masterson is blaming his trial lawyer for his 2023 rape convictions and accusing his defence crew of “failure of due diligence.”
Masterson, at present serving 30 years to life in jail for raping two girls, filed a petition for habeas corpus — a authorized motion difficult the lawfulness of his imprisonment — on Monday, which blamed his trial lawyer, Philip Cohen, for failing to name any witnesses and for not pushing again on prosecutors’ claims about Scientology, Selection studies.
Masterson, 49, “implored (Cohen) to current not less than a minimal modicum of protection proof, however counsel refused,” in keeping with the submitting.
“Cohen had a longstanding aversion to presenting affirmative protection proof within the instances he tried,” the submitting stated.
“He personally spoke to solely two of the greater than 20 potential witnesses who had been strongly beneficial by co-counsel Karen Goldstein and investigator Lynda Larsen. He wrote off the nice majority of them with none private contact, however their manifestly exculpatory prior statements to the police and to investigators.”
Within the petition, Masterson additionally alleges police and prosecutors had been prejudiced in opposition to Scientology, partially as a result of involvement of former Scientologist Leah Remini, who supported his accusers publicly.
“She was welcomed into the prosecution fold as an adviser, strategist, authoritative arbiter on the coverage and practices of the Church of Scientology, and advocate for the complaining witnesses,” stated the petition. “She was welcomed despite the fact that the LAPD knew that she had an ongoing vendetta in opposition to petitioner.”
The actor was discovered responsible of two of three counts of forcible rape throughout his retrial in Might 2023. He had pleaded not responsible to the fees in opposition to him. The retrial was referred to as after 2022’s unique trial on the identical three counts led to a mistrial when a jury deadlocked, failing to achieve unanimous verdicts.
Get every day Nationwide information
Get the day’s prime information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
Throughout the second trial, deputy district lawyer Reinhold Mueller and his crew tried to color Masterson as a serial rapist who had been protected by high-ranking officers within the Church of Scientology. (Masterson and his household are all members of the church.) They claimed Masterson, on separate events, put medication into the drinks of a longtime girlfriend and two different girls he knew via the church earlier than he raped them.
The victims claimed Scientology officers threatened them for years after they reported Masterson’s abuse to police. The Church of Scientology has denied all accusations of wrongdoing and was not a celebration in Masterson’s trial.
On the retrial, prosecutors referred to as Claire Headley to the stand. She is an ex-Scientologist who testified that the church requires particular permission to go to authorities.
Based on the brand new submitting, the church’s attorneys urged Cohen to name Hugh Whitt, a longtime Scientologist, to talk to the declare, however Cohen and his co-counsel didn’t name him.
“Why have we heard a lot about Scientology?” Cohen requested in his closing argument as a substitute of rebutting Headley’s declare. “May it’s there’s issues in any other case with the federal government’s case?”
The petition argues that Cohen didn’t interview quite a few defence witnesses who may need helped Masterson’s case by difficult the credibility of his accusers.
“This failure of due diligence violated the well-settled precept of Sixth Modification case regulation that an lawyer should interview potential protection witnesses as a essential basis for making a reasoned determination about trial technique,” the petition added.
“In sum, the jury noticed solely the tip of the iceberg of accessible protection proof within the type of the complaining witnesses’ inconsistent statements whereas the wealth of straight exculpatory proof went unused for no viable tactical motive.”
Masterson’s appellate lawyer, Eric Multhaup, claims that the jury “heard solely half the story – the prosecution’s aspect.”
“The unfairness of the second Masterson trial was the results of prosecutorial misconduct, judicial bias and the failure of protection counsel to current exculpatory proof,” Multhaup stated in a press release to the Los Angeles Instances on Monday. “The habeas corpus petition is accompanied by 65 reveals that doc the proof of innocence that might have been offered, however was not.
“Danny deserves a brand new trial the place the jury can hear his aspect as properly.”
Masterson’s attorneys filed a separate enchantment final December, alleging that key witness testimonies morphed over time and “misguided judicial rulings” skewed the jury’s view of the proof in opposition to him.
In a press release posted to the Cliff Gardner regulation places of work web site, the attorneys stated there have been “two elementary flaws” in Masterson’s convictions, one being the aforementioned skewed view and the second a “beautiful quantity” of alleged exculpatory proof “by no means offered to the jury.”
His authorized crew went on to say that these are solely “one half” of their deliberate problem to his convictions, and they’re working in direction of Masterson’s “full exoneration.”
— With information from The Related Press
© 2025 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
